The Lottery and Its Critics
A lottery is a system for awarding prizes based on a random selection of entrants. It is a form of gambling in which payment of some consideration (money, property, goods) is required to participate. Modern lotteries are generally regulated by state law and may be operated by private organizations or state-owned enterprises. A prize may be a cash award, goods, services, or an entry into a secondary lottery. The word lottery is derived from the Latin term lutere, meaning “to draw” or “to choose.” The first state-sponsored lotteries were held in Europe in the mid-15th century. The term was borrowed into English in the early 16th century, though the lottery had existed in England for several centuries prior to that.
The state-sponsored lotteries that were established in the United States after New Hampshire’s 1964 launch followed remarkably similar patterns: The state establishes a monopoly for itself; contracts with a private firm to operate it as a public corporation in exchange for a percentage of profits; launches a modest number of relatively simple games; and, under constant pressure to raise revenue, progressively introduces new types of games.
In addition to the general appeal of winning a fortune for a couple of bucks, lotteries have had their share of critics. Many studies have found that people with lower incomes play the lottery in disproportionate numbers, and that winning a major jackpot can be a serious budget drain. Some observers have even argued that the lotteries serve as a disguised tax on those least able to afford it.
Lottery advocates typically argue that the public benefits of a lottery far outweigh the cost. For example, the money raised by a lottery can be used for such things as road construction and education. In colonial-era America, for instance, lotteries helped to finance the construction of Harvard and Yale and also provided much-needed funds for the Continental Congress and George Washington’s army.
When lotteries are introduced, they usually enjoy broad public support and generate large revenues initially. However, as the initial boom wears off, revenues begin to plateau or even decline. This triggers a second wave of criticism that focuses on more specific features of lotteries’ operations, including the problem of compulsive gambling and the alleged regressive impact on lower-income groups.
Some state lawmakers have sought to change this dynamic by proposing constitutional amendments that would permit a state to privatize its lotteries and eliminate the profit-sharing arrangements with private promoters. These proposals, if approved by voters, could significantly alter the dynamics of how states raise and spend lotteries’ proceeds.